Saturday, August 7, 2010
Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
My friend has a three month old daughter and is trying to get full custody from her ex, who she left because he was an alcoholic and smoked pot. She is freaking out bc he coerced her to take ecstasy one time and thinks he might try to get the court to take a hair sample to prove it. Her ex has always buzzed his hair so he doesn't have to worry. She took it about four months before she was pregnant but wants to cut her hair really short before their next court date so he can't do that.
I told her I don't think they would take her hair but I don't know. Should she cut her hair?Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
Even if he buzzes his hair they will find hair somewhere in the body, legs, ***, arms, anything. Trust me my ex shaved his head but they still found other hair they can use.Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
Usually they won't do something that drastic unless the other party is going to pay for it. If her ex isn't willing to fork out that money, they won't do the test. On top of that, the majority of the time, they only go back a certain amount of time (usually 3-6 months). I wouldn't go as far as to cut all my hair off because it isn't likely that they will do a hair test and even if they do, they won't go back as far as when she did it.
tHAT IS TO LONG AGO THAT WON'T BE IN HER SYSTEM ANYMORE..DON'T WORRY
Now you know why Brittany Spears was hairless, top and bottom, for a while. But if you are going to try to defeat the hair test, you have to remove every bit of hair from the body.
The test only shows drugs taken into the body while the specific hair was growing. Unless your friend has really long hair, what she took more than a year ago, ( 4 months before preg ) isn't going to matter.
don't worry extacy only stays in her system for a few days...shell be ok..
I wouldn't worry about a drug test for this. Even if they did a hair test it would show when she took it.
Even if he shaves his head i promise he has hair other places they could us.
Don't bother with a hair cut if its really been a year. They don't normally do a hair drug test. and as I said, they do his also.
The answer is yes he can request a hair folicle test if he can raise suspision in the courts eye. However, most hair folicle tests only go back 120-180 days. And shaving your head wont do any good. Because the can take hair samples from anywhere on your body. nose eyelash eyebrow ear pubic aor armpit. Cutting hair will not only raise suspision but look bad as well. Tell her to hang tight. And if shes doing dope then she deserves to lose custody. Not so much she deserves to lose custody but that baby deserves better. Short of that her husband has to prove her unfit to raise a child to really have any kind of case.
I told her I don't think they would take her hair but I don't know. Should she cut her hair?Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
Even if he buzzes his hair they will find hair somewhere in the body, legs, ***, arms, anything. Trust me my ex shaved his head but they still found other hair they can use.Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
Usually they won't do something that drastic unless the other party is going to pay for it. If her ex isn't willing to fork out that money, they won't do the test. On top of that, the majority of the time, they only go back a certain amount of time (usually 3-6 months). I wouldn't go as far as to cut all my hair off because it isn't likely that they will do a hair test and even if they do, they won't go back as far as when she did it.
tHAT IS TO LONG AGO THAT WON'T BE IN HER SYSTEM ANYMORE..DON'T WORRY
Now you know why Brittany Spears was hairless, top and bottom, for a while. But if you are going to try to defeat the hair test, you have to remove every bit of hair from the body.
The test only shows drugs taken into the body while the specific hair was growing. Unless your friend has really long hair, what she took more than a year ago, ( 4 months before preg ) isn't going to matter.
don't worry extacy only stays in her system for a few days...shell be ok..
I wouldn't worry about a drug test for this. Even if they did a hair test it would show when she took it.
Even if he shaves his head i promise he has hair other places they could us.
Don't bother with a hair cut if its really been a year. They don't normally do a hair drug test. and as I said, they do his also.
The answer is yes he can request a hair folicle test if he can raise suspision in the courts eye. However, most hair folicle tests only go back 120-180 days. And shaving your head wont do any good. Because the can take hair samples from anywhere on your body. nose eyelash eyebrow ear pubic aor armpit. Cutting hair will not only raise suspision but look bad as well. Tell her to hang tight. And if shes doing dope then she deserves to lose custody. Not so much she deserves to lose custody but that baby deserves better. Short of that her husband has to prove her unfit to raise a child to really have any kind of case.
So today i got tested for the flu.. is my case more serious?
so i went to the doctor today and got tested for flu, it was positive, and my doctor told me it's most likely the swine flu, but i'm getting worried because i get dizzy and i when my room was 76 degrees i was freezing, shivering, goosebumps, had a jacket, etc, and then about 30 min later i was feeling really hot, my rooms still 76 degrees, i changed into shorts(i had sweatpants on) and took my jacket off, and put my fan on high, and i'm still really hot. also when i breathe through my nose i can feel like warm air coming out. by the way i'm 13 years old.So today i got tested for the flu.. is my case more serious?
Normal.Actually very mild compared to when I had the normal flu once.So today i got tested for the flu.. is my case more serious?
You are just as normal as everyone else. Everyone gets these symptoms with the flu, you dont have anything to worry about :) Just get plenty of rest, drink a lot of fluids, and eat healthy foods, i recommend toast. Just take good care of yourself really, it will pass. (nyquil wouldnt hurt either)
And about it being swine flu, dont worry. Its only serious for those that are extremely elderly, or extremely young (like 1 year olds). The sick, like people with an already existing disease, will be more vulnerable. But you should be just fine :) It will pass eventually.
those are all normal symptoms of being sick and of the flu.
If your case was super serious you'd be unbale to breath, coughing up tons of mucus in bed dying, like in the 1918 flu. Of course that's not happening to you, so no.
Normal.Actually very mild compared to when I had the normal flu once.So today i got tested for the flu.. is my case more serious?
You are just as normal as everyone else. Everyone gets these symptoms with the flu, you dont have anything to worry about :) Just get plenty of rest, drink a lot of fluids, and eat healthy foods, i recommend toast. Just take good care of yourself really, it will pass. (nyquil wouldnt hurt either)
And about it being swine flu, dont worry. Its only serious for those that are extremely elderly, or extremely young (like 1 year olds). The sick, like people with an already existing disease, will be more vulnerable. But you should be just fine :) It will pass eventually.
those are all normal symptoms of being sick and of the flu.
If your case was super serious you'd be unbale to breath, coughing up tons of mucus in bed dying, like in the 1918 flu. Of course that's not happening to you, so no.
Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
My friend has a three month old daughter and is trying to get full custody from her ex, who she left because he was an alcoholic and smoked pot. She is freaking out bc he coerced her to take ecstasy one time and thinks he might try to get the court to take a hair sample to prove it. Her ex has always buzzed his hair so he doesn't have to worry. She took it about four months before she was pregnant but wants to cut her hair really short before their next court date so he can't do that.
I told her I don't think they would take her hair but I don't know. Should she cut her hair?Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
Exctasy does'nt migrate down the hair like opiates. So it will only be in the segment that was formed in the follicle the day after she took the drugs. If it was four months ago she would have to cut her hair prety short but definitely not buzzed. She could leave like 2-6 inches depending on how fast her hair grows. They usually get reative and pull hairs from somewhere on the body to avoid sample tampering as some products can be applied to the hair that mess up the tests. People usually don't think to apply these products to there arm hair or pubics and in my experience testers take hairs from obscure regions.
I SERIOUSLY doubt that she will be drug tested with a hari test in this situation. They are very expensive and no family ourt would ever order this. Maybe her ex could bring it up in his case and use her refusal as evidence in his favor but she should just ask him to pay for it and if he will she should since one use probably( 1 in like 200 chance) will not show up anyway. He will not pay though they cost like $500-$1000 for anyone good enough to even possibly detect a single use. Don't cut your hair BABE!!!!!Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
If she is forced to take a drug test, she can force him to take a drug test as well. They can use hair from any part of your body, so the hair on your head isn't as important as you may think. Also, they go by percentages when it comes to drug use in certain cases, so if she only did it once and he has done it several times, that will show up in the tests.
The court can force her to provide a hair sample for drug testing if they deem it appropriate, she can request that he provide one as well. They don't just take the hair on people's heads, if no hair samples can be taken from the head they will take them from the pubic region. If she purposefully tries to screw with the test by shaving off her hair, it will work against her in court. Alcohol is the only thing that really stays detectable for the lifetime of the hair. Amphetimines are detectable in the hair for about 90 days, LCD for only about 3 days, weed about 90 days, PCP about 90 days etc. I'm not exactly sure about ecstasy but I believe ecstasy is a form of amphetimine, so as long as she hasn't used it within the last 3 months (I should hope not considering her daughter is 3 months old) then she should be ok.makeup art
I told her I don't think they would take her hair but I don't know. Should she cut her hair?Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
Exctasy does'nt migrate down the hair like opiates. So it will only be in the segment that was formed in the follicle the day after she took the drugs. If it was four months ago she would have to cut her hair prety short but definitely not buzzed. She could leave like 2-6 inches depending on how fast her hair grows. They usually get reative and pull hairs from somewhere on the body to avoid sample tampering as some products can be applied to the hair that mess up the tests. People usually don't think to apply these products to there arm hair or pubics and in my experience testers take hairs from obscure regions.
I SERIOUSLY doubt that she will be drug tested with a hari test in this situation. They are very expensive and no family ourt would ever order this. Maybe her ex could bring it up in his case and use her refusal as evidence in his favor but she should just ask him to pay for it and if he will she should since one use probably( 1 in like 200 chance) will not show up anyway. He will not pay though they cost like $500-$1000 for anyone good enough to even possibly detect a single use. Don't cut your hair BABE!!!!!Hair testing for drugs in custody case?
If she is forced to take a drug test, she can force him to take a drug test as well. They can use hair from any part of your body, so the hair on your head isn't as important as you may think. Also, they go by percentages when it comes to drug use in certain cases, so if she only did it once and he has done it several times, that will show up in the tests.
The court can force her to provide a hair sample for drug testing if they deem it appropriate, she can request that he provide one as well. They don't just take the hair on people's heads, if no hair samples can be taken from the head they will take them from the pubic region. If she purposefully tries to screw with the test by shaving off her hair, it will work against her in court. Alcohol is the only thing that really stays detectable for the lifetime of the hair. Amphetimines are detectable in the hair for about 90 days, LCD for only about 3 days, weed about 90 days, PCP about 90 days etc. I'm not exactly sure about ecstasy but I believe ecstasy is a form of amphetimine, so as long as she hasn't used it within the last 3 months (I should hope not considering her daughter is 3 months old) then she should be ok.
Can hair follical testing be done in a divorce case concerning custody?
my wife has smoked pot in the last month and i need to know the best test to ask for her to take to prove that she is smoking pot what is the best test?Can hair follical testing be done in a divorce case concerning custody?
You need to discuss all this with your lawyer. He needs all the info on what is going on with her. If the custody depends on her drug use yes it can be done. Usually for pot the pee test is the best but has to be done with a day or 2 after smoking it....Can hair follical testing be done in a divorce case concerning custody?
check with your attorney about this he will advise you I AM SURE
THANK YOU
Do you even care about your kids or is it all about winning against your wife? I guess you've never done anything questionable that she knows about? You will have to explain your behavior to your kids one day--and all the brainwashing in the world won't make them happy to not have a mother. Or maybe you've already replaced her? I really hope you have better reasons for wanting custody than this.
From experiance YES they can do that. Hair follical is the best way to tell.
I'm not sure that you can force a hair follicle test on someone. Check with your state laws. The most common test is the urine test. Many employers do this and also check for 'cleansers'. That checks for certain herbs and drugs that are meant to mask THC in the urine. Some employers consider this a positive test result. You'll have to check with state laws on this again. Even if a judge wouldn't convict someone of drug abuse based on evidence of them taking something to mask the active ingredient in marijuana, they may take that into account when determining custody. Check with your attorney.
HAIR FOLLICAL TESTING CAN BE DONE- IF SHE PASSES YOU WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PAY FOR TEST. WHICH IS VERY EXPANSIVE- THEY WOULD PROBALY REQUIRE HER TO DO A URINE TEST FIRST- REASON IS THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED ON WHAT SHE IS DOING CURRENTLY. IF SHE IS GOING THRU CHILD CUSTODY HEARING AND VERY RECENTLY SMOKED POT- THAT WOULD BE BE CONSIDERED AN ADDICT
You need to discuss all this with your lawyer. He needs all the info on what is going on with her. If the custody depends on her drug use yes it can be done. Usually for pot the pee test is the best but has to be done with a day or 2 after smoking it....Can hair follical testing be done in a divorce case concerning custody?
check with your attorney about this he will advise you I AM SURE
THANK YOU
Do you even care about your kids or is it all about winning against your wife? I guess you've never done anything questionable that she knows about? You will have to explain your behavior to your kids one day--and all the brainwashing in the world won't make them happy to not have a mother. Or maybe you've already replaced her? I really hope you have better reasons for wanting custody than this.
From experiance YES they can do that. Hair follical is the best way to tell.
I'm not sure that you can force a hair follicle test on someone. Check with your state laws. The most common test is the urine test. Many employers do this and also check for 'cleansers'. That checks for certain herbs and drugs that are meant to mask THC in the urine. Some employers consider this a positive test result. You'll have to check with state laws on this again. Even if a judge wouldn't convict someone of drug abuse based on evidence of them taking something to mask the active ingredient in marijuana, they may take that into account when determining custody. Check with your attorney.
HAIR FOLLICAL TESTING CAN BE DONE- IF SHE PASSES YOU WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PAY FOR TEST. WHICH IS VERY EXPANSIVE- THEY WOULD PROBALY REQUIRE HER TO DO A URINE TEST FIRST- REASON IS THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED ON WHAT SHE IS DOING CURRENTLY. IF SHE IS GOING THRU CHILD CUSTODY HEARING AND VERY RECENTLY SMOKED POT- THAT WOULD BE BE CONSIDERED AN ADDICT
Why is the DNA from the Anna Nicole case being sent to Ohio to be tested??
DNA, in high profile cases, is often sent to 2 or 3 different places for analysis to insure that all results are exact.Why is the DNA from the Anna Nicole case being sent to Ohio to be tested??
Great facility for testing best in the world, Maury uses it. The lawyers agreed on the sight.
This should be a Maury Povich show, can see it now, Howard you are NOT the Father!Why is the DNA from the Anna Nicole case being sent to Ohio to be tested??
Because expensive lawyers are really good at confounding the fact that your abuse of Oxycodone pills (lab made heroin for rich people like Rush Limbaugh and Anna) led to your son's drug addiction and death, and ultimately played a role your own. The vultures picking over Anna's bones apparently don't want certain things to get out, and Bahamas officials are easy to pay off. My guess is that someone has paid someone off for favorable results OR Ohio is actually a more legit lab compared with whatever they have in the Bahamas.
This whole thing is shady. America's whore, the men who loved her money, and her junkie son are apparently more important than Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan.
According to the news, The guy who's doing it is the best there is and he and his facilities are in Ohio.
Great facility for testing best in the world, Maury uses it. The lawyers agreed on the sight.
This should be a Maury Povich show, can see it now, Howard you are NOT the Father!Why is the DNA from the Anna Nicole case being sent to Ohio to be tested??
Because expensive lawyers are really good at confounding the fact that your abuse of Oxycodone pills (lab made heroin for rich people like Rush Limbaugh and Anna) led to your son's drug addiction and death, and ultimately played a role your own. The vultures picking over Anna's bones apparently don't want certain things to get out, and Bahamas officials are easy to pay off. My guess is that someone has paid someone off for favorable results OR Ohio is actually a more legit lab compared with whatever they have in the Bahamas.
This whole thing is shady. America's whore, the men who loved her money, and her junkie son are apparently more important than Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan.
According to the news, The guy who's doing it is the best there is and he and his facilities are in Ohio.
Does the court send an actual ';physical order'; to the respondent in a paternity case for DNA testing?
My ex petitioned me for paternity and support through the department of economic security. I got a petition stating that both of us should get dna testing but it said nothing about dates, deadlines, and there was no ';court'; order. I have 20 days in my state to respond with a response to whether i agree or disagree with the petition. I filed my response a couple of days ago but I have never received an order directly from the court demanding i go for DNA testing. My ex texted me saying that if I have not gone for DNA testing yet that there is a warrant out for my arrest. Is this true or does the court have to actually mail me an order telling me I have to appear for dna testing, where to appear, and by what date? I would think that the court wouldn't even send out an order until after my 20 day response period? How does that all work? Do they mail me a court order now that I have responded or was there some time line I am totally unaware of?
I live in Arizona, Maricopa County.Does the court send an actual ';physical order'; to the respondent in a paternity case for DNA testing?
The Arizona Statute
25-807. Precedence of maternity and paternity proceedings; delay for blood or tissue tests; court order; evidentiary use; alternative tests
A. Proceedings to establish maternity and paternity shall have precedence over other civil proceedings. The case shall be set for trial within sixty days from the filing of an answer or oral denial by the defendant.
B. A delay in determining paternity in an action commenced prior to the birth of the child shall be granted until after the birth of the child for purposes of paternity tests if any party to the proceedings requests.
C. The court, on its own motion, or on motion of any party to the proceedings, shall order the mother, her child or children and the alleged father to submit to the drawing of blood samples or the taking of deoxyribonucleic acid probe samples, or both, and shall direct that inherited characteristics, including but not limited to blood and tissue type, be determined by appropriate testing procedures. An expert duly qualified as an examiner of genetic markers shall be agreed upon by the parties or appointed by the court to analyze and interpret the results and report to the court.
D. If the results of the blood tests indicate that the likelihood of the alleged father's paternity is ninety-five per cent or greater, the alleged father is presumed to be the parent of the child and the party opposing the establishment of the alleged father's paternity shall establish by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged father is not the father of the child.
E. The examiner's report shall be admitted at trial unless a timely written challenge to the examiner's report is filed with the court within twenty-one days of the initial trial date. If the results of the examiner's report have been challenged and on the reasonable request of a party, the court shall order an additional test to be made by the same laboratory or an independent laboratory at the expense of the party requesting additional testing.
F. If a timely written challenge is not filed pursuant to subsection E, the examiner's report is admissible in evidence without the need for foundation testimony or other proof of authenticity or accuracy.
G. The court shall, on application of either party, determine the proportion and time in which the initial test costs shall be paid.
H. On motion of a party to the proceedings, the court may order that experts perform alternative or additional tests including medical, scientific and genetic tests.~
I live in Arizona, Maricopa County.Does the court send an actual ';physical order'; to the respondent in a paternity case for DNA testing?
The Arizona Statute
25-807. Precedence of maternity and paternity proceedings; delay for blood or tissue tests; court order; evidentiary use; alternative tests
A. Proceedings to establish maternity and paternity shall have precedence over other civil proceedings. The case shall be set for trial within sixty days from the filing of an answer or oral denial by the defendant.
B. A delay in determining paternity in an action commenced prior to the birth of the child shall be granted until after the birth of the child for purposes of paternity tests if any party to the proceedings requests.
C. The court, on its own motion, or on motion of any party to the proceedings, shall order the mother, her child or children and the alleged father to submit to the drawing of blood samples or the taking of deoxyribonucleic acid probe samples, or both, and shall direct that inherited characteristics, including but not limited to blood and tissue type, be determined by appropriate testing procedures. An expert duly qualified as an examiner of genetic markers shall be agreed upon by the parties or appointed by the court to analyze and interpret the results and report to the court.
D. If the results of the blood tests indicate that the likelihood of the alleged father's paternity is ninety-five per cent or greater, the alleged father is presumed to be the parent of the child and the party opposing the establishment of the alleged father's paternity shall establish by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged father is not the father of the child.
E. The examiner's report shall be admitted at trial unless a timely written challenge to the examiner's report is filed with the court within twenty-one days of the initial trial date. If the results of the examiner's report have been challenged and on the reasonable request of a party, the court shall order an additional test to be made by the same laboratory or an independent laboratory at the expense of the party requesting additional testing.
F. If a timely written challenge is not filed pursuant to subsection E, the examiner's report is admissible in evidence without the need for foundation testimony or other proof of authenticity or accuracy.
G. The court shall, on application of either party, determine the proportion and time in which the initial test costs shall be paid.
H. On motion of a party to the proceedings, the court may order that experts perform alternative or additional tests including medical, scientific and genetic tests.~
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)