If science developed a test for the ';gay gene'; in utero, would Christians be against abortion in that case?

Not that there has ever been a gay gene found, in fact much research seems to indicate a hormonal balance in the womb has something to do with it.





Still, if you are totally against homosexuality, what would you do if you *knew* that your unborn child would be gay?If science developed a test for the ';gay gene'; in utero, would Christians be against abortion in that case?
Isn't that the scariest thought ever? Mass abortions due to what would ultimately be their lifestyle choice?





But to be noted, not enough people with the ';gay gene'; are homosexual for scientists to actually declare it a ';gay'; test any time soon. Plenty of heterosexuals also have the ';gay gene.'; Not all homosexuals have the ';gay gene.';





Most of my homosexual friends are terrified of people trying to make pills or give abortions for those with children that are likely to be homosexual later on.If science developed a test for the ';gay gene'; in utero, would Christians be against abortion in that case?
Of course I would love him whether or not he was homosexual (not gay). I would also teach him the difference between who he was and what he did.





The homosexual ACT is what is offensive to God, not the person. That much is a choice.





God bless!
keep the child
I would abort a pregnancy if ultrasound showed something to soon be nonviable, such as an anacephalic fetus. And only that!
1991 test by gay biologist came up with that theory. Disproven in 1999 by Ottawa University and announced in ABC news.





But do what you want, most of it is culutural indoctrination, absent or violent father.
You are wrong. Several genes have been found to be implcated in homosexuality, but it is definitely not a single gene phenomenon and it is definitely not deterministic.





Given the complex interactions between genes (there are known to be about only 1/10th the genes present in the human genome necessary to express all an individuals characterstics - the rest comes from gene interactions) then ridding the race of four or five ';risk'; genes could be a disaster. We cannot predit what it would cause - maybe it would make all men murdering psychopaths, and maye it would wipe out religious suceptibility - who knows.
I'm not against homosexual acts any more than I am against other sin, including my own. Would you abort everyone, since all are sinners?? Furthermore, even if the disorder did have a genetic cause, the disorder itself is not sin. A person who has some trait that causes temptations toward certain kinds of sin still has the moral responsibility to resist temptation, just like anyone else. Homosexual tendencies are not sinful. Homosexual acts are.
I think they should not bcz it is against humanity and not only one gene is responsible to represent the sexuality of the person.





it depends on the environment( i suppose)





thats why i can see there are far more less people homosexual in asia (as the chiildrens dont know this as an option ).
How could they then say it was a sin, because that would be the same as saying having blue eyes is a sin, because they are to do with genes.